North Carolina Republicans have secured just one gubernatorial victory in the last 28 years—a surprising statistic for a state often characterized as a political battleground. Recently, conservative commentator Andrew Dunn (@andrew_dunn) offered a compelling theory: the state’s most influential Republican leaders, such as Senate President Pro Tempore Phil Berger and former House Speaker Tim Moore, may lack incentive to prioritize winning the Governor’s mansion.
Dunn posits that with a gerrymandered legislature allowing the GOP to enact much of its policy agenda, Republican leaders can maintain significant power without controlling the Governor’s office. Additionally, having a Democratic Governor provides a convenient political foil, enabling Republicans to galvanize their base by opposing high-profile vetoes and contrasting their priorities with Democratic leadership.
The Role of Gerrymandering and Its Consequences
This dynamic is rooted in the significant impact of gerrymandering, which has shaped North Carolina’s political landscape for more than a decade. Gerrymandered districts have ensured a Republican supermajority in the state legislature and a strong GOP presence in Congress. However, some argue that this same gerrymandering has contributed to the party’s challenges in winning statewide races.
By securing safe districts, Republicans have created a scenario in which primary elections often matter more than general elections. This has shifted the political focus toward satisfying the demands of the GOP’s most vocal and ideologically driven voters. As a result, candidates catering to the “MAGA” wing of the party—characterized by more extreme rhetoric and positions—have become increasingly prominent.
Candidates such as former Lt. Governor Dan Forest, Lt. Governor Mark Robinson, and Representatives Dan Bishop and Michele Morrow have gained significant traction within the party’s primary base. While their fiery rhetoric and hardline positions excite core Republican voters, they often alienate moderates and independents, who are critical in statewide elections.
A State Divided: North Carolina’s 50/50 Reality
North Carolina remains a politically divided state, with a nearly even split between Democratic and Republican voters in statewide elections. Democratic candidates, by comparison, have managed to avoid nominating candidates perceived as too extreme, allowing them to remain competitive in these tight races.
In gubernatorial contests, this balance is particularly apparent. While Republicans dominate legislative and congressional districts due to gerrymandering, the statewide electorate is far more diverse and nuanced. This division has made it difficult for Republican candidates with polarizing views to appeal to the broader electorate necessary to win the Governor’s office.
A Broader Challenge for the GOP
The GOP’s struggle to win gubernatorial races in North Carolina points to a broader intra-party challenge: how to balance the demands of an energized, ideological base with the realities of winning over moderate and independent voters in a closely divided state.
Without significant changes—such as reducing the influence of gerrymandering or appealing to a broader coalition of voters—Republicans may continue to struggle in statewide races, even as they maintain dominance in the legislature. For Democrats, this dynamic offers an opportunity to solidify their position in key statewide offices, as long as they avoid similar pitfalls of ideological extremism.
A Closer Look
The Bull City Citizen will continue to explore the intricacies of North Carolina politics, providing unbiased, in-depth reporting to help readers understand the forces shaping our state. Stay tuned as we examine the impact of recent redistricting battles, shifts in voter demographics, and the evolving platforms of North Carolina’s political parties.
For more political insights and updates, subscribe to the Bull City Citizen—your trusted source for local and statewide news.
